January 3rd, 2021 1-3PM ET
Sunday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
ENCORE! Special Guest – Jon Rappoport!
Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. He has written articles on politics, health, media, culture and art for LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, Village Voice, Nexus, CBS Healthwatch, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. In 1982, the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize, for his interview with the president of El Salvador University, where the military had taken over the campus
COVID vaccine clinical trials doomed to fail; fatal design flaw; NY Times opinion piece exposes all three major clinical trials Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, have written a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the ongoing COVID vaccine clinical trials. They expose the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials. September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”: “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?” “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.” “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.” “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.” “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.” This means these clinical trials are dead in the water.
These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications? The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases. But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem. According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death. To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine. The Moderna and AstraZeneca studies will involve about 30,000 participants each; Pfizer’s will have 44,000. Half the participants will receive two doses of vaccines separated by three or four weeks, and the other half will receive saltwater placebo shots. The final determination of efficacy will occur after 150 to 160 participants develop Covid-19. But that is only if the trials are allowed to run long enough. Pfizer will look at the accumulating data four times, Moderna twice and AstraZeneca once to determine if efficacy has been established, potentially leading to an early end to the trials.
COVID is a data-driven operation, but suppose the data are wrong? A recent New York Times article reported on a large study that concluded up to 90 percent of all US COVID cases are false-positives. There have been numerous reports of hospitals writing “COVID” on patients’ death certificates with no justification whatsoever. The CDC itself has stated that only 6 percent of reported US COVID deaths are FROM the virus. The rest are WITH the virus. This means something is very wrong. These mostly elderly people (the 94 percent) had prior medical conditions that were potentially lethal on their own. Both COVID case numbers and death numbers show evidence of fraud. According to law, significant fraud committed during a disaster is a felony, with a penalty of up to 30 years in prison. Wouldn’t you expect a law-enforcement agency to be conducting an investigation of potential COVID fraud? After all, the lockdowns and the economic devastation are justified on the basis of…what? Case and death numbers. Data. If the data are wrong, someone in the Justice Department should find that out.
How CDC/WHO will fake the effects of the COVID vaccine to make it look like a success Making a vaccine look like it’s a champion isn’t difficult for public health agencies. There are a number of strategies. Of course, these fraudulent strategies would be serious crimes. But when has that stopped the CDC or the World Health Organization? In no particular order—- ONE: Rework the definition of a “COVID case.” Presently, the CDC absurdly allows doctors to diagnose a person with COVID who has a cough, or chills and fever, and lives in an area where cases are being claimed. No test necessary. So change this practice, once the vaccine is approved. Demand testing for a diagnosis. State that cough alone is not enough. Chills and fever must also be present. Require fever to be above 100. These and other changes would automatically shrink the number of cases. The drop in numbers would be attributed to the vaccine. This “definitional shrinking” was, in fact, deployed in the 1950s, after the introduction of the polio vaccine. TWO: Order a change in the way the PCR diagnostic test is done. The practice of amplifying the original test sample from the patient occurs in cycles, or jumps. The greater the number of cycles, the more likely the test will result in a COVID diagnosis. Therefore, order a reduced number of cycles for all testing labs.
Exposed: There’s a new federal court to handle all the expected COVID vaccine-injury claims The simple truth is: the US government is anticipating many people will be filing claims for compensation, when their family members are harmed or killed by a new COVID vaccine. Of course, the government isn’t coming right out and admitting that. The press will tout the usual excuses for injury and death. “He died from COVID, not the vaccine.” “Well, there was just one bad batch of vaccines.” “Because COVID is such a dire situation, and we’re rushing to save lives, a few mistakes are inevitable.” Anything but the truth: GUESS WHAT, THE VACCINE IS HIGHLY TOXIC. This new federal vaccine court for COVID will operate exactly like the present system for paying out claims for vaccine injury to children. Citizens have to jump through many absurd hoops and navigate all sorts of red tape, to try to squeeze money out of the federal government. The system is set up that way. It’s your basic bureaucratic nightmare. The language that establishes the new COVID vaccine court is found in the Federal Register, 3/17/20, buried in section 14 of a document titled: “Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19.”
Overturning COVID restrictions and states of emergency I’ve been covering the decision in the Pennsylvania COVID case and the court filing in Ohio. They give us the templates for potential victories in other states and countries. (‘Lawsuit’ article archive here) In Pennsylvania (ruling), a federal judge just ruled that Governor Wolf’s COVID containment measures are unconstitutional. The judge went further. NO emergency cancels the Constitution. There is a line that cannot be crossed. The right to assemble, to have freedom of movement, to earn a living—they can’t be wiped off the board by lockdowns for ANY reason. This is, indeed, a heroic ruling. It affirms the unmistakable rays of light emanating from the basis of the American Republic. In Ohio attorney Thomas Renz’s gigantic Ohio filing against Governor Mike DeWine, both the Constitution and issues of fact/science are asserted. Facts mean something. A declaration of emergency must undergo scrutiny, to determine whether a clear and present danger justifies the declaration.
Covid update: The grand Ohio legal case for our time, against kings on their thrones The news is coming fast, the implications are titanic. On Monday, I wrote about Thomas Renz, the Ohio lawyer who is taking on a case for a set of plaintiffs, against Ohio Governor Mike DeWine and the state of Ohio. The charge: DeWine has created massive damage through lockdowns and other “containment measures” designed to stop the spread of the purported coronavirus. Against DeWine, attorney Renz has mounted a legal case to defeat both Constitutional violations AND gross scientific fraud. (Attorney press release posted here; Attorney plaintiff document filed with court posted here.) (‘Lawsuit’ article archive here) Update: A crucial part of this case is the DISCOVERY process. Attorney Renz and his colleagues would have the opportunity to sit down with key players in the COVID operation and grill them, in great detail, on matters of fact and science. Imagine Fauci, Birx, Redfield in the room having to answer very probing questions UNDER OATH.
In the year 3000: children of the pandemic June 8, 3000. Press Briefing from the FREEDOM TRUST. Subject: Origins of the VID Church.
ONE: Worldwide, the VID Church has nearly 500 million members. Its two main practices are mask wearing and selective distancing. Our TRUST scholars have traced these practices to the early years of the 21st Century.
TWO: Until now, it has been thought that anonymity and self-effacement were the roots of the VID practices. But new research has uncovered startling details.
THREE: In or about 2016, fear-inducing propaganda about an epidemic was broadcast across the world. The reputed cause of disease was a purported virus. As we now know, most of these particles are artifacts of laboratory tests, or beneficial carriers of waste products from cells. But in those ancient days, viruses were portrayed as dire threats.
FOUR: In 2016, and for some two decades moving forward, the so-called epidemic and the purported virus were called COVID. Eventually, the label was shortened to VID.
FIVE: Cults of the VID proliferated. The masks and the distancing were “scientific” superstitions, whose purpose was containment of the virus.
To Trump aides: you have no idea how deep the CDC scandals go Trump aides and CDC loyalists are at war over the CDC’s handling of COVID reports. Charges; counter-charges.  A core issue is the veracity of CDC weekly updates on case and death numbers. These are included in the “Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR).”  This is a long-standing, highly regarded, and widely referenced CDC publication. Medical professionals (who aren’t known for their ability to think straight) rely on these CDC numbers. Now that Trump aides are taking issue with the MMWR, defenders are circling the wagons. One such defender called the MMWR “the holy of holies.”  So I had to write this article. I had to revisit the 2009 Swine Flu case-counting fiasco. You see, that summer, while the CDC was reporting thousands of Swine Flu cases in the US, they had secretly… Stopped counting the numbers of cases.  The person who discovered this was Sharyl Attkisson, the star investigative reporter for CBS News