SaneVax Blows the Whistle on Merck’s Recombinant HPV Shot Gardasil, Liam Scheff on the 9/11 Questions You Are Not Allowed to Ask Jon Stewart and More on The Robert Scott Bell Show September 8, 2011

Breaking News: SANE Vax Inc. Discovers Potential Bio-Hazard Contaminant in Merck’s Gardasil™ HPV 4 Vaccine

Norma Erickson, President, and Leslie Carol Botha, Vice-President of Public Relations for SANE Vax Inc. join RSB to explain the shocking news about Gardasil contamination that is rocking the pharmaceutical industry and governments worldwide.  Listen as they explain their findings and the potential health risks the contamination poses potentially affecting millions of adolescents around the world. The letter sent to Dr. Margaret Hamburg at the FDA stated, “One of the HPV DNA fragments detected in the vaccine is part of a synthetic construct (GenBank Locus SCU55993) for HPV11 major capsid protein L1 gene, a recombinant DNA genetically engineered specifically for manufacturing of the Gardasil vaccine.” http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/ and http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-announces-the-discovery-of-viral-hpv-dna-contaminant-in-gardasil/

What about the HPV vaccine fact sheet? Here is the direct link: HPV Vaccine Fact Sheet http://sanevax.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/03.27.11-HPV-Vaccine-Fact-Sheet121.pdf

Today is the Call-in Lobby Day with the ANH to Save our Supplements! Have you called in yet? http://www.anh-usa.org/details-on-our-september-8-call-in-lobbying-day/

You can also take action with Natural News and the Life Extension Foundation to Save Our Supplements! http://www.naturalnews.com/033482_FDA_dietary_supplements.html and http://www.lef.org/featured-articles/0719_FDA-views-supplements-as-synthetic-food-preservatives.htm

What are the questions that even Jon Stewart, America’s most trusted anchorman, will not ask about the events on and surrounding 9/11/2001? Liam Scheff joins me for an in depth discussion of them and more! http://liamscheff.com/2010/11/jon-stewart-americas-anchorman-on-911/

Fifteen Questions for John Stewart
by Liam Scheff

1. Why did her superiors in the FBI sabotage FBI agent Colleen Rowley’s investigation of suspected terrorists prior to the 9/11 attacks, but later either keep their jobs, or receive promotions?

2. Why did FBI translator Sibel Edmonds report that she found a money-laundering, drug-trafficking, influence-peddling network inside the agency, stretching from the Middle East to Congress, used to funnel money to terrorists responsible for 9/11? Why did the FBI fire her for pursuing these leads?

3. Why did Attorney General John Ashcroft place Edmonds under a “States Secrets” gag order, preventing her, under penalty of law, from testifying or speaking about what she’d seen?

4. Why did Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta report that on 9/11, Dick Cheney tracked Flight 77′s approach to the Pentagon, without ordering it to be intercepted?

5. Why did Donald Rumsfeld state, one day before 9/11, that 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions was missing? (Which might have been in the part of the Pentagon that was destroyed? Which happened to be the only section recently reinforced to withstand air attack?)

6. Why was Ptech, a company founded by Saudi businessman Yasin al-Qadi, (who would be put on the terror watch list after 9/11), operating powerful data-replicating software in the basement of the Federal Aviation Administration for two years before 9/11?

7. Why was Indira Singh, software engineer at JP Morgan Chase, told to “shut her mouth and have a wonderful life,” when she told her employers about her grave concerns over Ptech; and further that the people who had revealed information about Ptech “should be killed?”

8. Why did US intelligence agencies ignore, overlook or actively suppress warnings in the lead up to 9/11 from foreign intelligence agencies, including Israel, Egypt, Russia, France, Germany, Britain and Pakistan of of imminent attacks by hijacked aircraft on US buildings, including the WTC?

9. Why did Larry Silverstein, holder of the lease of the World Trade Center buildings, give an order to “pull” building Seven, right before it collapsed into its own footprint at free-fall speed, its steel structure reduced to shippable lengths a building damaged far less than neighboring WTC buildings and not struck by an airplane?

10. What is the significance that building Seven also contained the offices of the CIA, Secret Service, SEC, IRS, records for the Enron and WorldCom cases, and the Office of Emergency Management for NYC?

11. Why were Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and other officials warned that the South Tower was “gonna collapse” ten minutes before it came down?

12. Why did dozens of New York City firefighters, first responders, journalists and citizens report hearing, seeing and experiencing ongoing explosions throughout the building, rising from the basement and encircling the structure in a manner reminiscent of a “controlled demolition,” just before the towers fell?

13. Why did NIST investigator John Gross claim he’d never seen the pools of molten metal under the collapsed WTC buildings, despite the fact that firefighters, first responders, journalists, and city officials all gave testimony that molten metal at temperatures in excess of 2000°F burned beneath the rubble for three months after the towers exploded?

14. Why did EPA chief Christine Todd Whitman tell New Yorkers and workers at Ground Zero that it was safe to return to the area, despite the fact that the WTC explosions released tons of asbestos into the air, as well as lead, mercury, and other poisons, which killed hundreds and caused illness in thousands?

15. Why did President George W. Bush at first stonewall an investigation into 9/11 for 411 days, then starve it for funds, and staff it with Texas oilmen with Saudi business interests, Neo-Conservative loyalists, and Bush family fixers and insiders?

Also, RSB will review last night’s Republican presidential candidate debate. Did they allow Ron Paul to speak? Was the HPV shot mandate mentioned? You bet it was. How about fences and freedom? That and more! I will tell you this: Ron Paul has already won. How? Because most all of the other candidates have begun to say what he has been saying for over 30 years! Stand by for more… http://www.dailypaul.com/177473/nbc-gop-politico-debate-paul-v-perry

Maybe its time for some Food Security? Be Prepared, Not Scared! http://premium.naturalnews.tv/Be_Prepared_Food_Security.htm

Peace-of-Mind Homeopathic medicine kit, including remedies for radiation exposure! Call 1-800-543-3245. Now available for $89.99 for RSB Show listeners: http://www.kingbio.com/store/product.php?productid=16375&cat=0&page=1

Listen live here 12 Noon – 2 PM EDT: http://www.naturalnewsradio.com/

or here: http://www.talkstreamlive.com/talk_radio/robert_scott_bell.stream

In case you missed my broadcast from Sunday (9/4/11) on GCN from this past Sunday, you can still listen to it here: http://www.gcnlive.com/programs/robertScottBell/ Guests included nutritional expert Bill Stanton as we discussed massive vaccine cover-ups, healing politics, separation of medicine and state and more! Also, RSB gets really ticked off in the first hour about the wussification of Americans as they subjugate themselves to a corrupt federal bureaucracy. Consider yourself forewarned…

Sign up for email alerts here: www.NaturalNews.com/RobertScottBell

Previous episodes of the Robert Scott Bell Show: http://www.naturalnewsradio.com/Archive-RobertScottBell.asp

2 thoughts on “SaneVax Blows the Whistle on Merck’s Recombinant HPV Shot Gardasil, Liam Scheff on the 9/11 Questions You Are Not Allowed to Ask Jon Stewart and More on The Robert Scott Bell Show September 8, 2011

  • Pingback: SaneVax Blows the Whistle on Merck’s Recombinant HPV Shot Gardasil, Liam Scheff on the 9/11 Questions You Are Not Allowed to Ask Jon Stewart and More on The Robert Scott Bell Show | SaneVax

  • September 8, 2011 at 8:31 am
    Permalink

    DOES GARDASIL CAUSE CANCER?
    This is a undoubtedly a special question considering that Gardasil is promoted as a vaccine which is intended to ultimately prevent cancer. However, the question is both relevant and justifiable because a credible and satisfactory answer has not been presented.

    Sane Vax discovers potential bio-hazard in Gardasil:
    http://sanevax.org/sane-vax-inc-discovers-potential-bio-hazard-contaminant-in-merck%E2%80%99s-gardasil%E2%84%A2-hpv-4-vaccine/

    The presence of viral HPV recombinant DNA (rDNA) contamination which has been discovered in samples of the vaccine from New Zealand, Australia, Spain, Poland, France and three states in the U.S. is of deep concern.

    As Dr. Lee states: “Based on medical literature and some of the FDA/Merck’s own publications, adventitious (coming from an outside source) DNA in an injectable protein-based vaccine may increase the risk of autoimmune disorders and gene mutation which may lead to malignancies”.
    Further, quote from the above press release from Sane Vax:

    “High rates of autoimmune disorders, 380 reports of abnormal pap tests, 137 reports of cervical dysplasia, and 41 reports of cervical cancer including Carcinoma in situ or Cervix carcinoma or Cervix carcinoma stage 0 or Cervix carcinoma stage I or Cervix carcinoma stage III 6 warrants an immediate investigation into Gardasil’s™ safety and efficacy”.

    Information in the package insert states that the vaccine has not been tested for carcinogenicity. (Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!)

    In addition, there is the extremely relevant issue of “replacement”, a normal phenomenon in virology where strains which have been removed are always replaced by new ones. It is not known to anyone, including the manufacturer, whether the new virus strains are more carcinogenic than the original ones which have been removed.

    In other words it cannot possibly be guaranteed that Gardasil does not increase the risk of cancer before at least the following three issues have been seriously considered:
    – the presence of recombinant DNA (rDNA)
    – lack of carcinogenicity testing of the vaccine
    – replacement

    It may be most inappropriate and have deeply tragic consequences if Gardasil, which is sometimes incorrectly termed a “cancer vaccine” is shown to actually increase the risk of cancer.

Comments are closed.