Aug 9, 2023 3-5PM ET
Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
BREAKING: Over 25% of elderly residents of a SNF died within a 20-day period after getting the COVID jab in December 2020 A SNF with over 150 residents had over 40 deaths in January 2021, shortly after the COVID vaccine was administered to the residents. That is a statistical impossibility if the COVID vaccines are safe. There was no news coverage when this happened. Finally, someone decided to reach out to me and tell me the story. The information I received comes directly from a long-time employee of the SNF. A skilled nursing facility (SNF) with an average of 152 residents administered the COVID vaccines to employees and residents on Dec 28 & 29, 2020. Between Jan 2 and Jan 20, 2021, approximately 42+ residents died. The management had to interrupt the staff’s holiday to call them back to work due to all the deaths. Here’s the kicker: In all of 2020, this facility had ZERO COVID deaths. The average in-SNF annual mortality rate at SNFs is 7.8% (see Table 3). That means that the chance of seeing 42 or more deaths in a 20-day window with 152 residents (where we’d normally see .65 deaths) is given by:
>>> poisson.sf(41, .65)5.236053428716437e-60 In other words, this is not simply a statistical outlier. There is absolutely no way these deaths weren’t COVID vaccine related. There was no news coverage of this and nobody has ever leaked this story to the press. Until just now.
CDC, Pharma Giants Angle for Annual COVID Shots Despite ‘Unclear’ Science The U.S. House of Representatives Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic wants to know more about plans by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to recommend annual COVID-19 vaccines. During a July interview with Spectrum News, CDC Director Mandy Cohen said she “anticipate[s] that COVID will become similar to flu shots, where … you get your annual flu shot and you get your annual COVID shot.” As part of the House investigation into federal COVID-19 vaccination mandates and policies, Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-Ohio) last week sent a letter to Cohen, stating: “It is unclear if the science supports such a recommendation. If this anticipated CDC recommendation occurs, it will mark a significant change in federal policy and guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccines and the way in which they are utilized.” Wenstrup requested all documents and communications about any annual — “or any other time-based iteration” — recommendation for COVID-19 booster shots, including correspondence between or among the CDC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (also under the subcommittee’s investigation), the White House, the CDC Foundation, CDC contractors and any other CDC stakeholders. Pfizer, Moderna and Novavax are slated in September to release new single-strain COVID-19 shots targeting the Omicron subvariant XBB.1.5. These vaccines are not yet approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but manufacturers are following the June 15 recommendations of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC).
Study By Former FDA Advisors Finds Agency Is Biased Towards Approving New Drugs A new study highlights how federal drug regulators are more likely to approve new drugs than in years past, even when scientific advisors recommended against allowing the new treatment onto the U.S. market. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) followed the advice of its scientific advisory committee nearly every time the advisors recommended approval of a new drug. However, the agency only followed those recommendations two thirds of the time when it recommended the agency reject a new drug approval request. The findings were published on July 7 in the journal JAMA Health Forum. More Drug Approvals, Less Advisory Meetings Researchers from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, including former FDA advisory committee members, conducted a manual review of summaries prepared by FDA staff for 409 drug advisory committee meetings from 2010 to 2021. The findings indicated 88% of FDA regulatory actions were aligned with advisory committee recommendations, including votes on initial drug approvals and safety actions. However, the FDA was more likely to agree with advisory recommendations if the recommendation was in favor of approving a drug, compared to when the recommendation opposed approving a drug or withdrawing a drug from the market. In 97% of instances where advisory committees voted in favor of approving a new drug, the FDA approved that medication. But the agency only denied a new drug approval in 67% of cases where scientific advisors recommended that drug not be approved. The study also found that, over time, meetings involving votes on new drug approvals also declined. Over the study period, the FDA convened fewer advisory committee meetings. In 2012, there were 50 advisory meetings convened, but by 2020 that number dropped to 18, and in 2021 the FDA convened only 18 meetings.
Massachusetts State Police must reinstate 7 troopers who refused to be vaccinated, arbitrator says Massachusetts State Police must reinstate seven troopers who refused to be vaccinated for COVID-19, an independent arbitrator has ruled. The troopers have been on unpaid leave, but the arbitrator’s decision means they can return to work with retroactive pay if they choose. The union representing state troopers, which plans to hold a news conference Monday outside the State House, filed a grievance after the law enforcement officers were suspended following former Republican Gov. Charlie Baker’s 2021 order requiring executive department employees to be vaccinated. Current Democratic Gov. Maura Healey lifted the vaccine mandate in May. Massachusetts State Police are in the process of determining the “scope as well as the administrative and legal steps” needed to implement the arbitrator’s ruling, David Procopio, an agency spokesperson, said Sunday in an email. The arbitrator concluded State Police violated a collective bargaining agreement in the way they handled the cases of eight troopers who cited religious grounds for refusing to take the vaccine. The agency summarily dismissed the troopers instead of reviewing their accommodation requests, the arbitrator said Friday. One of the eight troopers later returned to work. The State Police Association of Massachusetts criticized the former Baker administration for refusing to work with the troopers.
Special Guest Frank Cousineau
CCS President Frank Cousineau host the Annual Cancer Control Society Convention, introducing 40 speakers over a three day period and moderating a Doctors’ Symposium on day four. Throughout the year, the Cancer Control Society distributes literature, books and videos on everything in Alternative Medicine from amygdalin to zinc. Cancer Control Society answers many calls each day, giving direction and hope to those in need. CCS also attends other conferences and public events throughout the year, distributing information on CCS and the latest findings in Alternative Therapies. CCS also publishes its Green Sheet, a directory of doctors practicing Alternative Medicine, and its Patient Sheet, a list of names, addresses and phone numbers of patients who say they were controlled by Alternative Therapies. You are invited to call any of them. The Cancer Control Society is a non-profit organization, dependent upon donations for its mission: to prevent and control Cancer and Other Diseases through Nutrition and Non-Toxic Therapies. For more information, please call The Cancer Control Society, (323) 663-7801.
48th Annual Cancer Convention
September 2-6, 2023 – Labor Day Weekend
Glendale Hilton Hotel
100 W. Glenoaks Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91202
- Map for directions
- About the hotel
- Setup and Reservation with Hilton
- Reservation via phone: 1-877-414-8017 (ask for the Cancer Control Society group rate)
Information About Our Annual Cancer Convention
Alternative Therapies for Cancer and Other Diseases
Meet Recovered Cancer Patients With Encouraging Reports
Learn about the prevention and control of cancer through nutrition, tests and non-toxic cancer therapies such as Laetrile, Gerson, Hoxsey, Poly-MVA, Enzymes and Immunotherapy from Medical Doctors, Clinical Researchers, Nutritionists and Authors.
Also learn about Chelation, DMSO, Oxygen, Herbal, Cellular and Electro-Magnetic Therapies in addition to natural therapies for Arthritis, Diabetes, MS, Heart and Eye Diseases.
What To Expect
- Life-savings Information to thousands of patients and their families
- Live speakers and exhibits (Sat., Sun., and Mon.)
- Meet recovered cancer patients with encouraging reports
- Doctor’s Symposium (Tues.)
- Tijuana Clinic Tours (Wed.)
- CEU’s for Nurses
Hour 2 – Outside The Box With Ty Bollinger!
It’s time to go Outside The Box again with Ty Bollinger! What will we be talking about today?
BREAKING: Imran Ahmed (CCDH) Facing Congressional Inquiry for “Disinfo Dozen” Report + Malign Influence on US Citizens Imran Ahmed, the CEO of The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) is undergoing investigation by the Committee on the Judiciary for providing the Biden Administration with the “Disinformation Dozen” report it used to malign American citizens and violate their civil liberties. Today, Jim Jordan, chairman of both the Committee on the Judiciary and the Committee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, sent Mr. Imran Ahmed, Chief Executive Officer of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), notification that the Committee on the Judiciary is conducting an investigation into how third parties like CCDH appear to have played a role in a “censorship regime,” involving coercion and collusion with the Executive Branch of the US government to censor protected speech and violate the civil liberties of Americans. In the letter, posted below, Jim Jordan informed Imran Ahmed that owing to the Committee’s constitutional oversight obligations, they are requesting all relevant information and documents from CCHD. Jim Jordan goes on to explain that the Committee is interested in “understanding the interactions between the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) and the federal government in particular, as well as between CCDH and social media companies.” Most notably, the letter states: “The Biden White House relied on CCDH’s report titled “The Disinformation Dozen,” in its unconstitutional pressure campaign against social media platforms to censor those, including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who CCDH maligned as “anti-vaxxers . . . responsible for almost two-thirds of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms.” As has been widely reported, CCDH’s document was based on fraudulent statistics, with a 300-fold magnitude of error, according to Facebook official statement and numbers. Yet no correction, apology nor retraction has ever been published despite the profound reputational and financial damage it caused the 12 named individuals in the their “disinformation dozen report, myself included.
Musk Sues Deep State Censorship Arm “CCDH” The fight for freedom is escalating. As increasingly more people are awakened to the truth and established propaganda outlets continue to lose credibility, we all have front-row seats to the final gasps of the Censorship Industrial Complex. We could talk about the verified lab-leak theory (or the COVID biolab recently busted in California), the latest evidence that our current president colluded with his crackhead son to sell U.S. influence, or that the CDC is already warning of a late-summer COVID wave. But that’s not what this article is about. Because all of the stories we’ve just listed have one thing in common: Censorship. One of the biggest blows to the Censorship Industrial Complex was the purchase of Twitter (now X) by Elon Musk. The social media platform just recorded record users despite slashing over 70% of their overhead budget. And unlike Facebook (and Instagram), Google (and YouTube), and countless other government-controlled media outlets, X has become the last true bastion of free speech online. Now, Elon Musk is suing one of the seediest and most aggressive operatives in the global effort to erode free speech. His target? The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), the same people that listed us, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Joseph Mercola, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, Sayer Ji, Dr. Rashid Buttar, Erin Elizabeth, and others in their “Disinformation Dozen” hit list. (We’re in the middle of releasing our latest docu-series, Remedy, which features all of the freedom fighters listed above and is dedicated to our dear friend, Dr. Buttar. Ironically, our Twitter ad for Remedy was blocked and our biggest Twitter accounts are still suspended!) We’re going to give you access to the entire lawsuit filed by Musk, break down the lawsuit itself, expose the CCDH’s allies and members, discuss the impacts of censorship on democracy, explain why the CCDH is just another covert arm of the Censorship Industrial Complex, and challenge you to fight for freedom.
RFK Jr. sues YouTube, Google over “misinformation policies” that violated his First Amendment rights Children’s Health Defense (CHD) founder and chairman on leave Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is taking aim at YouTube and its parent company Google for violating his and many others’ First Amendment rights through censorship. The 2024 presidential candidate says YouTube flat-out engaged in a “censorship campaign” against him that included removing videos of his speech at Saint Anselm College in New Hampshire, as well as interviews he did with clinical psychologist Jordan Peterson and podcaster Joe Rogan. Filed on August 2 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Kennedy’s complaint alleges that the United States government under fake president Joe Biden has taken “extraordinary steps to silence people it does not want Americans to hear.” Because of this censorship regime between Big Tech and Big Government, Kennedy as a valid presidential candidate has been limited in reaching the tens of millions of potential voters who are interested in hearing his message and platform. The lawsuit states that it is expected the censorship regime will remain in place and fully functional throughout Kennedy’s campaign, and will likely intensify the closer we get to the primaries. “Mr. Kennedy often speaks at length about topics people would like to ignore, including the negative health effects of toxic chemicals and potential safety concerns about the COVID-19 shots,” the complaint reads, adding that YouTube uses its fascist “medical misinformation” policies as an excuse to silence him and others. Not only is YouTube guilty of censoring various comments that Kennedy has made concerning pertinent medical issues, but it is also guilty of interfering with his campaign-related speeches and interviews, which is also known as election interference.
GENDER AGENDA: How can Neil Tyson call himself a man of “science” when he says that men can become women? Any one at any time can simply declare they are an elephant or a rhinoceros, but obviously that does not make it so. Children do it all the time to use their imagination and pretend. Today, children, teenagers, and adults can pretend, at any time, to be the other gender, and they can do this for extended periods of time, but it does not make it so. They are using their imagination. Pretending. How do we know? Because people can not turn into elephants just by thinking it, and men cannot turn into women, or girls turn into boys, because… wait for it… science. But wait, Neil deGrasse Tyson, who claims to be a science guru, believes that gender is a choice, at any given moment, and that any human can flow from being female to male, and back again, all day long, by just thinking it (and wearing different clothes, makeup, hairdo, etc). Yes, the astrophysicist you know from television and space documentaries spoke out and declared that gender fluidity is science! So everyone must believe it now, or else, they are all “anti-science.” Welcome to the gender-bender cult. If you are not a “member,” you are a bigoted enemy who is “anti-science,” a climate destroyer, a racist, and a gay-basher. The all-out fake-science guru Neil deGrasse Tyson thinks if a boy thinks he’s a girl, then biologically he is one, and same goes for birds and alligators Check out the Stephen A Smith podcast for the all-out fake-science science guru who thinks because a man thinks he’s a woman it makes him one, able to give birth to a baby and ovulate. Sci-fi-guru deGrasse must also believe that any child who thinks he/she is a bird can fly. Scientifically speaking, nobody should try to prove him wrong.
Recurring Pregnancy Loss Linked to Pesticide Exposure A recent study published in Scientific Reports has established a disturbing connection between exposure to pesticides and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). RPL, defined as the loss of three or more consecutive pregnancies before 24 weeks of gestation, points to an underlying reproductive health issue. According to the research, the endocrine-disrupting (ED) properties of pesticides can negatively impact several biological processes, including reproduction. Pregnant women often encounter environmental pollutants with serious implications for both maternal and newborn health. Various pollutants such as heavy metals, polychlorinated biphenyl, and pesticides carry ED properties that can transition from the mother to the developing fetus at alarming rates. Pregnant women are being exposed to an increasing number of harmful industrial chemicals, and with an abundance of data illustrating the vulnerability of pregnancy to chemical exposures, public awareness of these threats is mounting. The study assessed the presence of several pesticide components, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dieldrin, dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE), ethion, malathion, and chlorpyrifos, in blood plasma samples from patients experiencing RPL. It revealed higher levels of PCBs, DDE, dieldrin, and ethion in RPL cases, signifying a strong link between chemical exposure, placental oxidative stress, and apoptosis. This situation, in turn, leads to decreased human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels, serving as a potential biomarker for RPL risk. Pesticides are nearly ubiquitous in our environment. Previous studies indicate that dietary exposure is the main source of these chemicals in our bodies, though humans are likely to encounter hundreds to thousands of other chemicals.