November 18th, 2022 3-5PM ET
Friday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
‘You Can’t Make This Stuff Up’: Anti-Fentanyl Vaccine Funded by Military Blocks Drug’s ‘High’ Stanley Kubrick’s “A Clockwork Orange” features an experimental treatment — the Ludovico Technique — used to change the behavior of a young man who was addicted to sex and violence. Soon, we’ll have a vaccine designed to change human behavior — in real life. A team of nine researchers led by the University of Houston (UH) this week announced the development of an anti-fentanyl vaccine. The vaccine is designed to block fentanyl’s ability to enter the brain — and thus block its ability to create a “high.” According to a study in the journal Pharmaceutics, the research team tested 60 rats, 28 of which received the three-dose regimen of the vaccine. The researchers plan to start phase 1 trials of the vaccine on humans in 2023, according to the Daily Mail. They also will soon begin manufacturing clinical-grade vaccine. The UH study “could have major implications for the nation’s opioid epidemic by becoming a relapse prevention agent for people trying to quit using opioids,” according to lead author Colin Haile, M.D., Ph.D., a research associate professor of psychology at UH and the Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation, and Statistics, and founding member of the university’s Drug Discovery Institute. The study’s senior author, Therese Kosten, Ph.D., described the vaccine as a potential “game changer.” But others took a different view.
Special Guest Laura Oblon
Known as MLM’s “Wonder Woman”, Laura been a music minister (winning singing competitions and traveling), and has owned her own bakery (and being on Cupcake Wars as well as numerous news stories for her baking). As a third generation network marketer, her whole live has been touched by the profession. Mrs. Oblon has been a consultant, a master rep and top income earner in the companies she’s been involved with, all while raising 4 children on her own. Her coaching and mentoring is unparalleled and her health challenges is why we now have Nucleogenex a cellular health solution for people all over the world. Christ is the center of her life and you’ll feel it when she speaks what it mean to be sold out for Jesus.
Does a sick gut microbiome let COVID-19 take hold, or does COVID-19 make your microbiome sick? The fields of science and medicine have yet to find some part or process of the human body that isn’t affected (usually adversely) by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. We’re also learning that the microbiome of the gut influences the wellbeing of virtually every part and process of the human body. Some sort of still-mysterious biochemical composition (sometimes the word “balance” is applied) of the gut microbiome makes its influence favorable or unfavorable. One new study, at the New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine reports that infection with COVID-19 can encourage dangerous gut microbes to thrive. It is well-known that in recent decades, excessive or inappropriate use of antibiotics to fight infections with disease-causing bacteria has eliminated more-vulnerable bacterial species. Remaining are bacterial species which are more resistant to antibiotics. Gut bacterial ratios which deviate from ratios found in healthier individuals have also been linked to more severe infections with COVID-19. Previously, it has been unclear if illness was caused by COVID-19 disrupting the gut microbiome, versus a disrupted microbiome which is more vulnerable to the virus. The study reported here indicates that the virus disrupting the microbiome is the more common source of pathology.
G-20 Leaders Promote Global Vaccine Passports So ‘You Can Move Around’ Leaders of the Group of 20 (G-20) have issued a joint declaration promoting a global standard on proof of vaccination for international travel and calling for the establishment of “global digital health networks” that build on existing digital COVID-19 vaccine passport schemes. The joint statement followed the conclusion of the G-20 summit held in Bali, Indonesia, where leaders discussed global challenges and coordinating policies in response, including to future pandemics. The G-20 joint declaration reads: “We acknowledge the importance of shared technical standards and verification methods, under the framework of the IHR (2005), to facilitate seamless international travel, interoperability, and recognizing digital solutions and non-digital solutions, including proof of vaccinations.” The International Health Regulations, or IHR (2005), is an instrument of international law developed under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO) that lays down a global framework for responding to the international spread of disease. The WHO-backed standard, which entered into force in 2007, required countries to strengthen surveillance capacities at border crossings and introduced a series of health documents, including international certificates of vaccination. Besides acknowledging the utility of the IHR framework, the G-20 leaders said they support ongoing “international dialogue and collaboration on the establishment of trusted global digital health networks as part of the efforts to strengthen prevention and response to future pandemics.”
New Zealand’s International Travel Vaccination Certificate: A Ponzi Scheme? Do you know about New Zealand’s International Travel Vaccination Certificate? Me neither! It’s a little mysterious. I’m not sure if the government knows that much either. If officials do know about this so-called certificate, they’re not too keen to (transparently) share what they might know. I’m aware there is a certain kind of moral and legal jeopardy – imbued perhaps with a touch of tyranny, if the New Zealand government were to lock in a requirement for an International Travel Vaccination Certificate (ITVC). You see, the state has known for quite some time that the vaccine couldn’t prevent transmission of infection. Waves of reinfections are pounding the very New Zealanders who complied and were vaccinated, rather than lose their jobs. Rather than discuss early treatments which prevent the intensity and duration of infection, the government is now talking about a plan to restore quarantine. In this concerning, yet contradictory environment, my interest was piqued when I noticed on the New Zealand government Proof of COVID-19 vaccination status page, that ‘If you are travelling overseas and must show proof of your COVID-19 vaccination status, you need an International Travel Vaccination Certificate.’
Lab-grown meat cleared for human consumption by U.S. regulator The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the first time cleared a meat product grown from animal cells for human consumption, the agency announced on Wednesday. UPSIDE Foods, a company that makes cell-cultured chicken by harvesting cells from live animals and using the cells to grow meat in stainless-steel tanks, will be able to bring its products to market once it has been inspected by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), said a release from the FDA. “The world is experiencing a food revolution and the (FDA) is committed to supporting innovation in the food supply,” said FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf and Susan Mayne, director of the FDA’s Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition in a statement. The FDA said in documents released on Wednesday that it had reviewed data from the company and had no further questions about the company’s conclusion that its product is safe for humans to eat. “We are thrilled at FDA’s announcement,” said David Kay, UPSIDE’s director of communications, in an email. “This historic step paves the way for our path to market.” The review is not technically an approval and applies only to UPSIDE products, though the agency is ready to work with other firms developing cultured animal cell food, the FDA said in a release. USDA and FDA together regulate cell-cultured meat under a 2019 agreement between the two agencies. USDA will oversee the processing and labeling of cell-cultured meat products.
What Doesn’t Fauci Want Us to Know? We May Soon Find Out Restriction of free speech excelled during the COVID-19 pandemic, when efforts to shut down public discussions and information that countered the official narrative were in full force. In the summer of 2022, a lawsuit was filed by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana against the federal government, including Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. government colluded with Big Tech giants Twitter, Meta (Facebook), YouTube, Instagram and LinkedIn to censor certain viewpoints by labeling them “misinformation” or “disinformation.” In September 2022, a federal judge ordered Fauci and other officials to turn over emails with five social media firms. Fauci initially refused, stating that the communications were protected by executive privilege. However, the judge ordered that the documents be turned over within 21 days nonetheless. Fauci was also ordered to answer questions posed by the plaintiffs in full. Mary Holland, president and general counsel of Children’s Health Defense, explained: “Up until now, Dr. Fauci has operated under this cloak of ‘untouchableness,’ thinking he has been above the law. He likely didn’t expect his emails to be made public. We can only imagine what this tranche of emails will likely reveal about Dr. Fauci’s bare-knuckled censorship — it won’t be pretty.”
Tribunals Would Introduce Dangers of their Own From the start I vigorously opposed COVID lockdowns and protested the hysteria that lures people to tolerate such tyranny. Although I wasn’t the most eloquent of lockdowns’ critics, I – like Scott Atlas, David Henderson, Phil Magness, Jeffrey Tucker, Toby Young and the team at the Daily Skeptic, and the heroic authors of the great Great Barrington Declaration – never wavered from this opposition. Not for a nanosecond did I as much as toy with the idea that lockdowns might be worthwhile. Every impulse within me, from my marrow to my mind, confidently informed me that lockdowns were destined to unleash Orwellian oppression, the terrible precedential consequences of which will plague (pun intended) humanity for decades. Given all that we’ve learned since early 2020, I’m sad to say that my – and the relative handful of others’ – opposition to lockdowns and other COVID diktats was fully justified. My blood still boils at the thought of lockdowns, and my anger at those persons who imposed them is as intense a sensation as I have ever experienced. It continues to be so. I relate my early, unequivocal, and unending opposition to lockdowns not to applaud myself. I do so, instead, to put into context the case that I’m about to make in opposition to any and all calls for attempts to impose formal liability or sanctions on those individuals who inflicted lockdowns on humanity, or who were prominently positioned to encourage their use. I believe that attempts to hold lockdowners personally accountable by imposing on them formal punishments would create yet another terrible precedent, one that would only compound the troubles that we’re destined to suffer from the precedent that was set in March 2020.
Questions of The Day!
IF you are not a diabetic, are you still suggestion that we take one Chromium 3 times a day or would one capsule once a day be o.k.?
Question two-Do you believe a sun lamp is a good idea?
I have donated blood and money to them in the past. I receive regular requests from them asking for money. So far in 2022, each time I receive a request for donation, I send it back without a check but with a question handwritten across the return form: “Can you assure the public that you will not give vaccinated donated blood to unvaccinated people who need blood?” I keep getting their requests for money, but no answers to my question. What are your thoughts on this idea? Do you think I should contact my local hospital and ask them the same question? Should I pose the question to the US Department of Health (or do you think that would give them ideas on how to spread the spike proteins by a method other than shots.)?
Comments of The Day!
Dr Robert Scott Bell was absolutely wonderful at the Red Pill Expo last weekend. I am so grateful to have met him and I enjoy him as an MC at the RPE. He is a genuinely caring human and a gift to us all.
Yesterday’s guest…. We’ve been to their location a couple times. Delicious. First time we went when the ridiculous mandates were fraudulently “in effect’. Then the family all stopped in after our hike at Silver Falls this past summer. Beautiful little place and both times we were there the staff were wonderful and friendly. Happy they are only 30 minutes down the road. They aren’t organic but on rare occasions we do make exceptions.
Mike and Debbie