D.C. vax mandates, Duplicitous Dr. Fauci, Dr. Sherry Peel Jackson, Illusion vs. Reality of the Income Tax, Red Pill Expo, PCR test failure, YouTube certified experts, Robert and Jaime Agee, Banners 4 Freedom, Protein bars, Ban Red 3 and MORE!

October 31, 2022 3-5PM ET

Monday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:

URGENT! Tell the D.C. Council to Stop the COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate for School Children! The kids of Washington, D.C. need you to take immediate action! On Tuesday, Nov. 1, D.C. Council members will vote on whether or not to extend the compliance deadline for the COVID-19 vaccine mandate for students until the 2023-2024 school year. The law currently in place requires children age 12 and older to be vaccinated before the Jan. 3 deadline in order to remain in school. COVID-19 shots are not only unnecessary for children, but are dangerous and can cause serious injuries and death. It is time to end this mandate for good and give parents the ability to decide whether or not to give these shots to their children without coercion. The Council passed legislation in October 2021 that required COVID-19 vaccinations for all students age 12 and older within 70 days of the shots receiving full authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to remain in school. In an effort to avoid a mass exodus from the public school system due to poor COVID-19 vaccine uptake, D.C. Deputy Mayor of Education Paul Kihn sent a letter in August notifying public school leaders that the enforcement deadline for students ages 12 – 17 had been pushed back to Jan. 3, 2023. Children are already suffering academically as a result of lockdowns and other COVID-19 measures. This mandate stands to force parents and children to choose between taking a dangerous product which they have avoided thus far, or go further into a downward academic spiral.

The Duplicitous Dr. Fauci and His Backpedaling On October 26, 2022 Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down with Peter Staley of the Harvard Institute of Politics, for a conversation about “Covid and Career in Public Health.” In an environment of being adored, Fauci made his biggest backpedal so far, while still defending his disastrous Covid policies. Fauci is in complete denial of the inefficacy of masking the population at large to prevent disease spread. Fauci answers a question from Staley about face masks with a question “Should we have been wearing masks from the very first weeks when we had ten people infected and one person died?” He answers his own question, “Knowing what we know now, if we had known it then the answer would have been absolutely yes.” This despite thorough studies both before, and during the pandemic, that masks had no significant impact on the spread of airborne diseases such as influenza and Covid. But it gets better (or worse, depending on your viewpoint). Fauci is also in almost complete denial about the tremendous harms to the health and well-being of millions of children and adults due to the lockdowns he promoted, and he states that we should have locked down sooner: “Let’s turn back the clock in January of 2020 where we had very few cases,” Facui told Staley, “They were just cropping up – the Washington case, and then some cases in New York. We weren’t exploding yet. If I had said we’d better shut down right now because this is an insidious virus that’s spreading widely without our knowing about it, do you think that would have been accepted by society? They would have laughed at us for that, but quite frankly, that was the right thing to do back then.”

Special Guest Dr. Sherry Peel Jackson

Dr. Sherry Peel Jackson is a retired Certified Public Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner and former IRS agent with over 35 years of experience in public, private and governmental accounting. She is a financial and business strategist who conducts basic and advanced financial education seminars across the United States. She also consults with businesses and individuals in the areas of IRS audit preparation, wealth creation, debt elimination and overall financial literacy. She conducts workshops for various establishments, including private companies, non-profit organizations and churches. Dr. Jackson has over 35 years of experience with church accounting and policy, pastor’s personal finances and church wealth creation strategies. She has conducted church compliance audits, presented on various topics at several ministry workshops and created strategic plans for churches in Metro Atlanta and beyond.

Peer-Reviewed Study Confirms Fatal Flaw in PCR Testing: 42% False Positive Rate for SARS-CoV-2 nonQ-RT-PCR Test. This means COVID-19 Vaccine Outcomes Rate Data are Unreliable and Invalid We have just published a new study that shows that nonQ-RT-PCR (non-quantitative RT-PCR testing as used to diagnose COVID-19 from 2020 to the present day suffers a flaw that ultimately draws into question all of what has been reported on COVID-19 by official channels, including the results of COVID-19.In 2003, CDC took the credit for curtailing the SARS-CoV-1 transmission. Among the method of control they claimed were essential to this included SARS-CoV-1 strain-specific PCR primers used to produce amplicons that were sequenced. The presence of the sequence was used to infer, correctly, whether the PCR reaction had produced a population of SARS-CoV-1 DNA molecules that were sequenced using FDA-designated gold standard – Sanger Sequencing, or an arbitrary population of DNA molecules that represented off-target amplicons. In 2020, for reasons no one has ever explained, the CDC changed the nucleic acid detection protocol to one that had never been tried before for control of respiratory viruses. Instead of using sequence-based detection, they merely used the results of a non-quantitative reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR as evidence of the presence of the virus, and then, equally inexplicably, decided to determine that a positive nonQ-RT-PCR test result indicated disease (COVID-19).

Hour 2

YouTube Announces It Will “Certify” Medical Information In Cahoots With The World Health Organisation YouTube has announced that it intends to allow medical professionals to become “certified” as “reliable” and “authoritative sources” in a fresh attempt to restrict so-called “medical misinformation” (anything that doesn’t match the accepted narrative). In a blog post, global head of YouTube Health Dr. Garth Graham wrote that “YouTube Health has been working on additional ways to help doctors, nurses, mental health professionals and healthcare information providers to bring high quality health information into the spaces that people visit throughout their day – like their favorite video-sharing app.” The post outlines that anyone applying for the certification must submit their medical license, and follow “best practices” criteria for health information sharing set by the Council of Medical Specialty Societies (CMSS), the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) and the World Health Organization (WHO). The post acknowledges that those bodies were directly involved in the scheme and “developed these principles outlining key aspects of info sharing.” The post states that applicants for certification must also have an account in good standing with YouTube and adhere to other criteria.

Special Guests Robert and Jaime Agee

Question of The Day!

Hi Guys,
There is a protein bar called “Built Bar ” my understanding is- (This is a good protein bar)-here are some of the ingredients: whey protein isolate-partially hydrolyzed whey protein isolate-digestion resistant maltodextrin-glycerin erythritol-gelatin-non fat dry milk=Are these considered healthy ingredients?-what does is “partially hydrolyzed mean? Thx Bill

FDA says it causes cancer. Yet it’s in hundreds of candies. Scientists urge FDA to ban Red 3—already illegal in cosmetics—from foods, ingested drugs, and supplements It’s illegal to use the carcinogenic color additive Red 3 in cosmetics, such as lipsticks or blush, or externally applied drugs. Yet the discredited chemical is lurking in common varieties of candy corn, Nerds, Peeps, Pez, SweeTarts, and hundreds of candies, cakes, and other foods, including dozens of seasonal Halloween items. That’s why the Center for Science in the Public Interest and 23 other organizations and prominent scientists are today urging the Food and Drug Administration to formally remove Red 3 from the list of approved color additives in foods, dietary supplements, and oral medicines. Since the early 1980s FDA had evidence that Red 3 caused cancer in laboratory animals. The National Toxicology Program considered the evidence “convincing.” As a result, in 1990, the agency eliminated certain “provisionally listed” uses of the chemical—meaning cosmetics and externally applied drugs. In 1990, FDA also said it would “take steps” to ban its use in foods, ingested drugs, and supplements. But those steps were never taken. “Halloween has never been the healthiest holiday, but few parents would believe that the FDA permits the use of a dye it acknowledges as a carcinogen to be used as a common ingredient in candy,” said CSPI consultant Lisa Y. Lefferts. “Fewer still would believe that the FDA prohibits this carcinogen in makeup but allows it in food.”

Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!