July 25, 2019 3-5PM ET
Thursday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Sacred Fire of Liberty!
It’s that time of the week where we get to explore the political healing that this country needs so desperately! Jonathan Emord is back to help us dissect the latest political news that’s fit to print:
Mueller’s testimony equals end of any Trump impeachment talk Among his talents, Donald Trump has a special gift for driving his detractors so crazy that they do really stupid stuff. The decision by Democrats to force Robert Mueller to testify before Congress is Exhibit A. Bumblin’ Bob was a train wreck of epic proportions. The fallout is immediate, starting with this: Impeachment is no longer an option. It had a slim chance before Wednesday’s painful slog and no chance after it. Mueller was that bad, seemingly hard of hearing, often confused, and contradicted himself several times. The Dems’ fantasy of having him breathe life into his report backfired. His dismal performance killed any possibility that his 450-page tome could serve as a road map for overturning the 2016 election and driving Trump from office.
Why Do Central Bankers Oppose a Gold Standard? Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s testimony before Congress was closely scrutinized not just for its economic implications but also for its political overtones. Powell cited “trade tensions” as a cause for concern about the strength of the global economy. He clearly seemed to be blaming President Trump’s tariffs. But if the tariffs are what ultimately move the Fed to cut rates, Trump will have finally gotten what he wants out of Powell. In recent weeks, Trump has stepped up his attacks on the central bank, calling it the biggest problem facing the economy, floating the idea of firing Powell, and suggesting his administration would match China’s and Europe’s “currency manipulation game.” Although many presidents before have pursued currency interventions and quibbled with Fed chairmen over interest rate policy, none have ever done it as openly and directly as the current one. Fed apologists in the media and in Congress view the central bank’s “independence” as being under assault.
The Homeopathy Solution In a world of rising medical costs, disease rates, and opioid epidemics, there is a safe, effective, and proven solution: Homeopathy. Just a century ago, there were 22 homeopathic medical schools, 100 homeopathic hospitals, and over 1,000 homeopathic pharmacies. Boston University, Stanford University, and New York Medical College all taught homeopathy. The evidence remains documented in studies, even after the Flexner Report — officially known as Medical Education in the United States and Canada —was published in 1910. The report was an attempt to align medical education under a set of norms that emphasized laboratory research and the patenting of medicine. The report was funded by John Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie, among others, in an attempt to eliminate homeopathy as its competition.
Hour 2 – vScienceBites With Dr. Sherri Tenpenny!
“Small bites you can remember
– to bite them in the behind”
vScience Bites Radio
small bites you can remember
to bite them in the behind
Date: July 23, 2019
NEW CONTACT EMAIL:
Text MVI to 555888 to join our email list
PROBLEMATIC INGREDIENTS – PART 2
We’re going to change the vScienceBites course a little bit in July – We’re going to be discussing the Problematic Ingredients in vaccines.
The theme for this month’s vScience Bites: Vaccination’s Problematic Ingredients. The topic for today: What do you know about these chemicals?
1. Problematic ingredients
On July 11, our first vScienceBites this month, we started the conversation about the problematic ingredients in vaccines. Most people have no idea what is really coming through that needle when a vaccination is given.
People may be familiar with a few of the chemicals in vaccines: polysorbate 80, formaldehyde, aluminum and mercury. In this week’s Point to Ponder, we’re going to examine two toxic chemicals that are never really talked about as ingredients in vaccines: antibiotics and B-propriolactone.
2. History of chemicals: neomycin and B-propriolactone
The mass production and use of penicillin began in 1945. With the availability of antibiotics, scientists started to use them in drug cultures that had eggs and animal cell, which are foreign proteins and are not sterile. In fact, they are often contaminated with stray bacteria.
The use antibiotics used in cell cultures has been debated for decades. Concerned scientists cautioned that the continual use of antibiotics could lead to resistant contaminants that could remain in the culture. The contaminants can then be injected into babies during routine vaccinations. Nonetheless, the use of antibiotics in cell cultures continues, and today, it is universally accepted.
There are 100s of antibiotics prescribed for humans and animals, with 8 different antibiotics used in vaccines. In this vScienceBites, we’re going to focus on one antibiotic in particular: neomycin.
Neomycin is a powerful antibiotic mostly reserved for serious infections. Neomycin has been reported to cause allergic and hypersensitivity reactions.
Disturbingly, 18 vaccines contain neomycin. You can print out this form and HIGHLIGHT the vaccines that contain neomycin. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/downloads/appendices/B/excipient-table-2.pdf
The MMR vaccine has 25 mcg of neomycin; this is 100 to 1000 times more than the amounts found in the other vaccines, where it is found in nanograms and picograms.
The second chemical that is rarely, if ever, mentioned is β-Propiolactone
This compound is created by a reaction between formaldehyde and a carbon-cluster known as a ketene. It was once widely used to manufacture a compound used in paints and plastics. It was phased out in favor of safer and less expensive alternatives. β-Propiolactone is used in vaccines as a disinfectant.
Now, this is what is most disturbing: Since 1999, β‑propiolactone has been listed as a known human carcinogen, based on sufficient evidence from studies in experimental animals. B-propriolactone cause cancer from all routes of exposure.
- Oral exposure lead to stomach cancer
- Topical exposure lead to skin cancer and
- Sub Q injections caused fibrosarcoma, adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinomas at the injection site.
But what did the human studies show regarding carcinogenicity? You know the answer to this – right? No vaccine has ever been tested or carcinogenicity…and no epidemiological studies were identified that evaluated the relationship between human cancer and exposure specifically to β‑propiolactone.
Vaccines that contain β‑propiolactone are the flu shots: Afluria and FluCelVax (made from Dog kidney cells) and two different rabies vaccines – Imovax and RabAvert, given prophylactically to veterinarians.
Articles on Vaccine Allergies
Neomycin is just one of many ingredients in vaccines that can cause several types of allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis.
Jan. 2014: Journal– Clinical & Experimental Vaccine Research (Full Text)
“Vaccine Allergies” – https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3890451/
The vaccine components include active immunizing antigens, conjugating agents, preservatives, stabilizers, antimicrobial agents, adjuvants and culture media used in the preparation of the vaccine, as well as inadvertent contaminants that are introduced during vaccine handling. Almost all the vaccine components can be considered as potential triggers of an allergic reaction. This article has a very extensive table worth looking at and downloading.
It is really worth while to read this paper – and see how they DOWNPLAY any type of allergic reaction. The actual number of persons who have a severe reaction is hidden by expressing the number as a percentage. To say “only 3%” has a reaction needs to be put into perspective. 3% of what number? 100,000? 1,000,000? Can you see now the 3% changes when put into perspective.
There are only a few monographs about Beta-propiolactone – even though ever government agency labels it as a “known carcinogen.” In this monograph, it says that, “The sata were last reviewed in IARC (1974) and the compound was classified in IARC Monographs Supplement 7 (1987).”
5. Summary of Data Reported and Evaluation
5.1 Exposure data: The main use of β-propiolactone has been as an intermediate in the production of acrylic acid and its esters. It has also been used for the sterilization of vaccines and blood products.
5.2 Human carcinogenicity data No data were available to the Working Group.
5.3 Animal carcinogenicity data β-Propiolactone inhalation exposure and subcutaneous injection, producing local tumors..
5.5 Evaluation There is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of β-propiolactone. Overall evaluation β-Propiolactone is possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B).
A Word about Mercury:
July, 2015: Journal – J of Epidemiology & Global Health. (full text)
“A longitudinal cohort study of the relationship between Thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccination and specific delays in development in the United States: Assessment of attributable risk and lifetime care costs.”https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210600615000647
“The results of the present study confirm and extend previous epidemiological studies finding a significant relationship between exposure to Thimerosal-containing childhood vaccines and an increased risk of specific delays in development. It was observed, in the overall cohort and the cohorts separated by sex, that infants who received increased organic Hg (mercury) from thimerosal-containing hepatitis B vaccines, in comparison with infants who received no organic mercury within the first month of life, the first 2 months of life, and the first 6 months of life, were significantly more likely to subsequently be diagnosed with specific delays in development. Further, it was observed that there was a significant dose-dependent relationship between increasing doses of organic Hg from hepatitis-B vaccines administered within the first 6 months of life and the eventual risk of a child being diagnosed with specific delays in development.”
COMMENT: This is one of the most critically important studies ever published showing the effect of injected mercury on a developing infant’s brain.
Sale on 7-module Problematic Ingredients Course
- Regular price: $39 each = $273 if purchased individually
- Bundled SPECIAL: All 7 modules = $199 – go to www.VaccineU.com/JulySpecial
The HPV vaccine is on trial as anti-vaxxers mobilize against effective cancer New research shows that the HPV vaccine is exceeding expectations in protecting individuals from HPV infection and precancerous cells. The study’s lead author, Mélanie Drolet, touts the potential “elimination of cervical cancer as a public health problem.” The new study, which is an analysis of 60 million individuals from 14 countries, found that vaccination protected both the vaccinated and the larger population via a “herd immunity” effect. In other words, even those who were not vaccinated were indirectly protected. And while HPV is most typically associated with cervical cancer, the virus can also cause other cancers, such as anal and penile cancer, and cancers of the head and neck, as well as nonfatal conditions such as genital warts. This is all great news. It now looks like we have a safe, highly effective vaccine that has the potential to significantly reduce many forms of cancer. So why is it also becoming a key target of many anti-vaxxers?
Glyphosate, amid courtroom battles, faces a test inside America’s homes Glyphosate, the active ingredient in the weed killer Roundup, is facing an unprecedented test in the courtroom, with more than 11,200 people alleging in pending lawsuits that exposure to the chemical led to cancer or other injuries. At the same time, the chemical is facing a trial of public opinion amid rising concerns about its safety. Tests from environmental groups are raising alarm with consumers, such as a recent study finding 21 oat-based cereal and snack products, including Cheerios, . That caught the attention of many parents, given the popularity of Cheerios among kids. Now, a new, small study from another environmental group found higher levels of glyphosate in children than their parents. The lawsuits and studies are prompting concerns among some parents and families about the chemical, which is used by farmers to control weed growth in their crops as well as by schools and municipalities in public spaces like school grounds and parks. So far, Bayer — which bought Roundup’s maker Monsanto last year — has that claimed the chemical caused cancer.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
More upcoming RSB events:
- The Truth About Cancer LIVE Oct 11-13 2019 Anaheim, CA
- Trinity Health Freedom Expo Oct 26-27 2019 Tinley Park, IL