Mar 8, 2020 1-3PM ET
Sunday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Special Guest – Jon Rappoport!
Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. He has written articles on politics, health, media, culture and art for LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, Village Voice, Nexus, CBS Healthwatch, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. In 1982, the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize, for his interview with the president of El Salvador University, where the military had taken over the campus.
Corona baloney: it’s the money, honey We all understand that governments can invent money out of thin air. However, inventing a reason out of thin air to invent the money sometimes takes a little more ingenuity. Enter THE VIRUS. The medical version of Satan. To new readers: to fully understand the next paragraph, you’ll need to read my previous articles on the “China epidemic” con job (archive here). —A virus whose very existence is in doubt; the diagnostic tests for the virus are entirely inadequate and useless and misleading; therefore, the case numbers are meaningless; the virus’ supposed origin (Wuhan) is a place where highly dangerous and unprecedented air pollution can account for the all the effects of the so-called virus—and now one prediction on steroids is pegging the eventual global case numbers at 15 million, and the cost of containing the virus at $2.4 trillion. The elite players are visiting their tailors and having their deep pockets deepened further to absorb this (planned) windfall. Let’s go local to grasp how a city government can scoop up a small piece of the action: Los Angeles.
Coronavirus: the definition of “cases” is producing a new level of illusion Buckle up. We’re not riding on a smooth superhighway. These roads are extremely bumpy and rough. Public health agencies and the press are casting out a blizzard of confusing terms: presumptive cases, infected persons, asymptomatic persons, confirmed cases, containment measures, persons connected to persons who are infected… It is my understanding that, now, the CDC is lumping together presumptive cases and confirmed cases, and calling them: CASES. Certainly, that strategy would immediately multiply the total number of CASES and also multiply fear among the uninformed population. A presumptive case would be a person who has not been tested for the coronavirus; or he has been tested, but the results are not yet in. Why is he a presumptive case in the first place? There could be several reasons. He has ordinary flu-like symptoms, and his doctor suspects he might be infected by the coronavirus, for no particular reason. He might have come in contact with a person who has been diagnosed as an epidemic case. He might have recently traveled to China—and has or doesn’t have flu-like symptoms. Maybe he has a slight cough…
Patient deaths are deployed to sell the coronavirus story I’m not going to keep reporting on the deaths of so-called coronavirus patients—there will be too many stories emerging. This article will briefly analyze the media coverage of nine deaths in Washington state. That coverage is typical. First, let’s get one thing straight. Death by itself does not equal coronavirus. “…approximately 7,452 people die every day in the United States. In other words, a person dies in the US approximately every 12 seconds.” (indexmundi.com) Understood? The psy-op is: put death and coronavirus in the same sentence. People will unthinkingly buy it. CBS News, March 4: “The number of coronavirus deaths in the U.S. rose to nine on Tuesday, according to health officials. All of the deaths occurred in Washington state.” That paragraph convinces most people the state of Washington is experiencing an outbreak. What else could it be? Answer: it could be anything. It could be several anythings. Kuow.org: March 3: “Health officials on Tuesday announced three more presumed coronavirus deaths in the Seattle area, bringing the Washington state death toll to nine.”
Hour 2 Encore on Genesis Communications Network
Special Guest Jefferey Jaxen
Jefferey Jaxen is a researcher, independent investigative journalist, writer and voice for health freedom on the front lines of society’s shift towards higher consciousness. Jefferey is constantly working behind the scenes to spotlight the untold, censored and under-reported stories of our time. His mission in life is to teach & empower others to take back their power and heal themselves. As a compelling writer, active researcher, and creative force his work has been catapulted into the mainstream. Jefferey was recently featured in the documentary The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest. His writing has been featured by RT, Natural News, InfoWars, Collective-Evolution, Waking Times, GreenMedInfo, The Truth About Cancer and countless others. Along with being a regular guest on national and international television networks and radio shows, his articles are read by tens of thousands weekly. In addition, he has set himself apart with his growing library of unique and original spoken word pieces.
New Study Finds HPV Vaccine Increased Serious Nervous System Disorders, General Harms A new study published in the open access Systematic Reviews journal titled Benefits and harms of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines: systematic review with meta-analyses of trial data from clinical study reports attempts to tackle the controversial vaccine. Using clinical study reports obtained from the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and GlaxoSmithKline from 2014 to 2017, study authors Lars Jørgensen, Peter Gøtzsche and Tom Jefferson set forth to assess the benefits and harms of the HPV vaccine. The researchers looked at twenty-four of 50 eligible clinical study reports containing 58,412 pages of 22 trials and 2 follow-up studies including 95,670 participants: 79,102 females and 16,568 males age 8–72.
WHY DO VACCINE SAFETY STUDIES CUT CORNERS? The authorities will tell you vaccines have undergone the ‘gold standard’ in safety testing. They will insist immunizations have a long safety profile. They will claim that the chance of harm from any of Big Pharma’s injectable product lines is one-in-a-million. But are they correct? Almost surely not. But don’t take our word for it. The BMJ medical journal has never been one to shy away from delivering medical findings, nor to demand transparency while other journals play it safe. The BMJ’s recent analysis looks at the World Health Organization’s (WHO) rollout of the malaria vaccine in Africa. Professors Peter Aaby and Christine Stabell Benn, two authors of the recent BMJ analysis, are asking seemingly obvious questions about vaccine safety that much of the medical community works hard to ignore. The analysis asks “can safety questions be answered after only 24 months?” Drug trials often allow what are called surrogate markers as evidence of a drug’s efficacy in clinical trials.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
More upcoming RSB events:
- NOCO Hemp Expo, Denver CO – March 27-28, 2020
- Be Healthy Utah Conference, Sandy UT April 17-18, 2020
- MAHO Expo Convention & Trade Show, Columbus OH – July 24-26, 2020