February 28th, 2021 1-3PM ET
Sunday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
Special Guest – Jon Rappoport!
Jon Rappoport has worked as a free-lance investigative reporter for over 30 years. He is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX. He has written articles on politics, health, media, culture and art for LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, Village Voice, Nexus, CBS Healthwatch, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. In 1982, the LA Weekly submitted his name for a Pulitzer prize, for his interview with the president of El Salvador University, where the military had taken over the campus
COVID: the virus was never proven to exist; a statement from Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell During this series of articles, in which I’ve been exposing the COVID PCR test as a fraud and a hoax and a con, I’ve assumed, for purposes of discussion, that the virus—SARS-CoV-2—is real and has been isolated. I’ve made that assumption in order to show that, within the official world of COVID, the PCR is a sham. However, as my readers know, for months I’ve been making the case that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists. Therefore, the PCR test is built to detect a fragment of a virus whose very existence has failed to meet a rational standard of evidence. This raises the absurdity of the PCR test to a whole new level. Researchers assume the piece of RNA the test is looking for is part of SARS-CoV-2. But without having the actual isolated virus in hand, there is no way to know this RNA fragment is any more relevant than a speck of dust on the moon. Recently, Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell published a statement concerning the existence of SARS-CoV-2. I am printing it here in full.
Defeating COVID Test Fraud: Memo to Lawyers and Clients As I’ve detailed in my current series of articles on the COVID PCR test fraud, the test is run in cycles. Each cycle is a quantum leap of magnification of the swab sample taken from the patient. When the test is run at 35 cycles or higher, the result is meaningless. Millions of those results are false-positives. The patient is falsely told he is “infected.” However, most labs FRAUDULENTLY run the test at 40 cycles, or even higher. And the labs do not disclose, to patients or doctors, how many cycles they are deploying. So…here is a legal strategy lawyers should consider. If a client is told to get tested, his lawyer states the following: “My client needs a sworn affidavit from the lab declaring how many cycles will be used.” If the lab refuses to comply, sue them. If the lab complies, and the cycles are higher than 35, sue them. We also know that test results from various labs are not uniform. One lab will say the patient tests positive; another lab will say negative. This fact has been an open secret in the testing community for decades.
Historic Portuguese Appeals Court ruling on PCR test I’m continuing my series exposing the COVID test fraud. On November 11, 2020—and ignored completely by major media in the US and other countries—the Lisbon, Portugal, Court of Appeal ruled against lockdowns, because they were based on unreliable PCR tests. The ruling was historic. The off-guardian covered the story : “Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests ‘Unreliable’ & Quarantines ‘Unlawful’; Important legal decision faces total media blackout in Western world” “Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.” “In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to several scientific studies. Most notably [a study by Jaafar et al], which found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.” “The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even fearmonger-in-chief Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”
PCR test revelations from official literature; they expose their own lies Here is another article in my series exposing the COVID PCR testing fraud. For purposes of discussion, I’m assuming the virus is real, and the case and death numbers are meaningful. Within that official world, the internal contradictions and lies are huge. QUICK OVERVIEW The lockdowns are based on high levels of COVID cases. “We have so many new cases, we have to lock down.” This claim is based on the diagnostic PCR test. The more tests you do, the more positive results come up. A positive result is taken to mean: the person is infected with the virus. But overwhelmingly, these so-called “infected” people have no symptoms. They are healthy. Nevertheless, each one is called a “COVID case.” This is absurd. A case should mean the person has clinical symptoms; he is sick. These people aren’t sick, and there is no indication they will get sick. So…expand testing, test millions of people, obtain results claiming “infection,” call all these healthy people “cases,” and order lock downs. This is a straight-out con. The real goal is lockdowns and economic devastation.
Hour 2 ENCORE! Special Guest – Thomas Renz
Attorney Thomas Renz is the lead Attorney in 3 major cases brought in Ohio, New Mexico, and Nationally against the CDC and HHS regarding the unconstitutional COVID-19 lockdowns, mask
mandates, business closures and more. His focus is serving justice with integrity at Renz Law Firm. Renz Law has been hired to fight for the rights of Americans by ensuring that the Constitution is honored during the response to COVID-19. While Tom recognizes that this fight is controversial, he believes it simply should not be. The Constitution of the United States does not allow for states to disregard the rights of American citizens without meeting the appropriate levels of judicial scrutiny. For fundamental rights, the State bears the burden of proof and must ensure our rights are only limited to the extent necessary to achieve a compelling governmental interest. Renz says “That simply is not happening.” Websites: www.
YouTube removes Ohio committee video, citing misinformation Legislative testimony made Wednesday in support of a GOP-backed effort to limit public health orders made by Ohio’s governor was removed from YouTube after the service deemed it contained COVID-19 misinformation. The Google-owned platform said it removed content that was uploaded this week to The Ohio Advocates for Medical Freedom channel for violating the company’s terms of services. The video showed Thomas Renz, an attorney for Ohio Stands Up, a citizen group, make the opening testimony during a House committee hearing on a bill that would allow lawmakers to vote down public health orders during the pandemic. In the more than 30-minute testimony, Renz made a number of debunked or baseless claims, including that no Ohioans under the age of 19 have died from COVID-19 — a claim that has been debunked by state data. “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, which we enforce consistently, regardless of speaker,” Ivy Choi, a spokesperson for Google, told The Associated Press. “We removed this video in accordance with our COVID-19 misinformation policy, which prohibits content that claims a certain age group cannot transmit the virus.” In an email response, Renz told AP, “ We strongly stand behind our claims and are considering our options,” and asserted that the group’s data is supported by scientific research.