January 11, 2023 1-3PM ET
Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
BREAKING! Alternative Healthcare Activists File Antitrust Lawsuit Against Legacy Media for Efforts to Silence Rivals on Internet Platforms Filed today, a first of its kind antitrust action against the British Broadcasting Company (BBC), the Washington Post, Reuters, and Associated Press for many millions of dollars seeks to address the censorship of healthcare freedom advocates, activists, journalists, and medical professionals who dared to question the narrative relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, the government response, and vaccine mandates. According to the lawsuit, a partnership called the “Trusted News Initiative”, or TNI, was created to exclude rival publishers from the dominant internet platforms who engage in reporting that challenges or competes with members of the TNI. This coordinated effort is a classic form of a “group boycott” for the purpose of removing smaller publishers from leading internet platforms, damaging their ability to compete or even survive. TNI members include Legacy Media companies including the Washington Post, BBC, Associated Press, Los Angeles Times, and Reuters, along with behemoth Big Tech companies including Meta (which owns and controls Facebook and Instagram), Google (which owns and controls YouTube), Microsoft (which owns and controls LinkedIn), and Twitter. Together, these companies control at least 85% of the online social media news market, 90% of the overall social media market, 90% of the social networking market, 75% of the video hosting market, and 95% of the search-engine market. The lawsuit reveals that in March of 2020, Big Tech and the Legacy Media entered into an “industry partnership” called the “Trusted News Initiative”, or TNI. The partnership was launched by BBC Director-General Tony Hall, with the agreement that members of the TNI “work together to . . . ensure that disinformation myths are stopped in their tracks.”
Pfizer Board Member Urged Twitter to Censor Posts on Natural Immunity, Low COVID Risk for Kids A Pfizer board member who used to head the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) lobbied Twitter to take action against a post accurately pointing out that natural immunity is superior to COVID-19 vaccination, according to an email released on Jan. 9. Dr. Scott Gottlieb wrote on Aug. 27, 2021, to Twitter executive Todd O’Boyle to request Twitter take action against a post from Dr. Brett Giroir, another former FDA commissioner. “This is the kind of stuff that’s corrosive. Here he draws a sweeping conclusion off a single retrospective study in Israel that hasn’t been peer reviewed. But this tweet will end up going viral and driving news coverage,” Gottlieb wrote. Giroir had written that it was clear natural immunity, or post-infection immunity, “is superior to vaccine immunity, by ALOT.” He said there was no scientific justification to require proof of COVID-19 vaccination if a person had natural immunity. “If no previous infection? Get vaccinated!” he also wrote. Giroir pointed to what was at the time a preprint study from Israeli researchers that found, after analyzing health records, that natural immunity provided better protection than vaccination. The study was later published in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases following peer review. Researchers said the data “demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.” BNT162b2 is the trade name for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, which is the main shot used in Israel.
Special Guest Dr. Paul Alexander
Dr. Paul E. Alexander, PhD, has expertise in teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former Assistant Professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine, a former COVID Pandemic evidence-synthesis advisor to WHO-PAHO, Washington, DC (2020), and former Senior Advisor to COVID Pandemic policy in the US government, Health and Human Services (HHS), Washington, DC. He worked/was appointed in 2008 at WHO as a Regional Specialist/Epidemiologist in Europe’s Regional Office in Denmark (nations involved in assigned WHO’s project were Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, Poland).
He was employed from 2017 to 2019 at the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), in Virginia, as the evidence synthesis meta-analysis systematic review guideline development lead/trainer.
Dr. Alexander worked for the government of Canada as an epidemiologist for 12 years, appointed as the Canadian in-field epidemiologist (2002-2004) as part of an international CIDA funded, Health Canada executed project on TB/HIV co-infection and MDR-TB control (involving India, Pakistan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangldesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Afghanistan, posted to Kathmandu).
Dr. Alexander is currently an independent academic scientist and COVID-19 consultant researcher. He is also informally providing support to some members of the US Congress.
Where’s the Woodward and Bernstein of the Covid Scandals? I was just a kid, but I’m old enough to remember Watergate. As I grew older, I learned more specific details about this historic event. Here’s my Watergate takeaway, which I think is the accepted “narrative” on this historic event: Watergate was the biggest political scandal of the century. The fallout or denouement caused President Nixon to resign from office and sent several “conspirators” to prison. It also made Woodward and Bernstein the most famous journalists of all time. Few people had heard of these journalists when they began compiling relevant facts about the original Watergate crime and obligatory cover-up, but this changed over the span of about two years. Based in part on these two journalists doing their jobs, Congressional officials decided to also do their jobs and before you knew it, most of the sordid story was known to the world. Woodward and Bernstein, who were already minor celebrities, really cashed in with the publication of their best-selling book All the President’s Men, which was adapted into an Academy Award-winning movie starring Robert Redford and Dustin Hoffman, two of the biggest stars of our era.
Disagreement Among Progressives Over Whether The Vax Is The Literal Body Of Fauci Or Just Symbolic A dispute regarding the nature of vaccination has arisen among faithful followers of The Science, and of Fauci its prophet. According to sources, some progressives say that the sacrament of vaccination is the literal body of Fauci, while others believe it is only symbolic. “The mRNA juice we inject into our bodies to cover our COVID becomes the literal body of our Blessed Lord Fauci through a process called tranvaxstantiation,” said progressive scholar Banz Tinkleman (he/him). “Whether it be Pfizer or Moderna, we can have faith that the real presence of Fauci is within the vax itself. To suggest otherwise is a damnable heresy. Why we…” Tinkleman was unable to finish his sentence, as the left side of his face suddenly stopped working. Several progressives, however, take issue with this view. “We vaccinate as a communal time of remembrance of Fauci and everything he’s done for us,” said a scholar Yix Mixley (she/her), who holds the opposing view. “We acknowledge that the spiritual presence of Fauci, blessings upon him, may be in with and under the vax, but reject tranvaxstantiation wholeheartedly.”
Special Guest Jodi O’Malley
Jodi O’Malley is a master’s prepared critical care nurse in a federal hospital for Native Americans. Her nearly two-year experience treating Covid patients ended abruptly when she courageously shared her insider video, showing the extent of underreported vaccine injuries and outright corruption of the healthcare system where policy and protocol have taken precedence over the Patient’s Bill of Rights. Today, she continues to spread her perspective helping women struggling while being a strong advocate for patient rights and encouraging early treatment of Covid symptoms.
CBD More Effective Than Conventional Treatments at Treating Skin Ulcers According to the American Cancer Society, skin cancer is the most common form of cancer. In fact, more than 1.5 million people were diagnosed with some form of skin cancer in the year 2020 alone. New research found CBD can help treat symptoms from certain skin cancers. It’s a serious health condition that is expected to only increase in prevalence going forward, with cases of skin cancer expected to increase as much as 50% around the world between now and 2040. Depending on the type of skin cancer a person has, and how severe it is, many cases of skin cancer are treatable. Other skin conditions may be rarer compared to skin cancer and do not receive as much attention, however, they can still be very serious. One such skin condition is scleroderma, which involves inflammation of the skin. Some patients develop skin ulcers as a result of scleroderma. Researchers in Italy recently examined CBD topical’s ability to treat skin ulcers, and they found that CBD topicals were more effective compared to conventional treatments.