June 10th, 2020 3-5PM ET
Wednesday on The Robert Scott Bell Show:
The WHO just obliterated every argument for mandatory vaccines or contact tracing by declaring asymptomatic carriers don’t spread COVID-19 Today the WHO declared that COVID-19 almost never spreads through asymptomatic carriers, all at once wiping out the entire justification for mandatory vaccines and contact tracing. As CNBC.com reported:“From the data we have, it still seems to be rare that an asymptomatic person actually transmits onward to a secondary individual,” Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said at a news briefing from the United Nations agency’s Geneva headquarters. “It’s very rare.”Asymptomatic spread was the entire reason why world authorities demanded lockdowns, social distancing and masks, too. It was also the underlying justification for demanding mandatory vaccinations and contact tracing. After all, if the spread of coronavirus were limited to only those who obviously showed symptoms — and could therefore be easily identified and avoided — there would be no logical need for lockdowns, social distancing, masks, contact tracing or mandatory vaccines, since spreaders of the pandemic could be easily identified and avoided (or isolated with selective stay-at-home orders only for the symptomatic).All at once, the WHO has just exploded all these narratives that were so aggressively pushed by the CDC, Democrat governors, Dr. Fauci at the White House and even the WHO itself. Now, based on the WHO’s new admission, not only should every lockdown be immediately ended; any government effort to initiate new lockdowns should be vehemently rejected as being utterly groundless and anti-science.
WHO walks back comments on asymptomatic coronavirus spread, says much is still unknown The World Health Organization walked back comments made Monday when one of its top scientists said transmission of the coronavirus by people who never developed symptoms is “very rare,” which drew skepticism from physicians and others across social media. That admission sent shock waves throughout the world, much of which has been locked down for months for fear of spreading the virus by people who show no signs of illness. Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the WHO’s emerging diseases and zoonosis unit, said Tuesday that asymptomatic spread is a “really complex question” and much is still unknown. “We don’t actually have that answer yet,” she said.“I was responding to a question at the press conference. I wasn’t stating a policy of WHO or anything like that. I was just trying to articulate what we know,” she said on a live Q&A streamed across multiple social media platforms. “And in that, I used the phrase ‘very rare,’ and I think that that’s misunderstanding to state that asymptomatic transmission globally is very rare. I was referring to a small subset of studies.”“Some estimates of around 40% of transmission may be due to asymptomatic, but those are from models, so I didn’t include that in my answer yesterday, but wanted to make sure that I covered that here,” Kerkhove said.
Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro said on Tuesday that he will consider pulling the country out of the World Health Organization once the coronavirus pandemic has passed.
Speaking to CNN Brasil, Bolsonaro said the WHO has not acted responsibly and has lost a lot of credibility, repeating recent criticism of what he claimed last week is a “partisan political organization.”
Reporting by Lisandra Paraguassu; Writing by Jamie Mc
Coronavirus Plandemic Shows Why We Need Separation of Medicine and State It seems like only yesterday. Americans were denied the right to go to their churches. They were denied the right to visit their loved ones in the hospital. They were denied the right to open their businesses and go to work to provide for themselves and their families. They were denied the right to go to restaurants, to bars, to hair salons.No laws were passed denying these rights. Even that would be illegal and immoral. But what happened was worse. They were denied these basic rights by governors, county judges, and even local mayors who used the coronavirus outbreak as an excuse to rule by decree. They stole power that was not theirs to take and wielded it at all levels to force America into three months of house arrest.Then, in the midst of stay-at-home orders across the country, the same governors and local officials who locked Americans in their homes suddenly came around with their keys and threw open the doors. Suddenly not only was it OK to go out into the street, it was required to go out into the street!
Former Army medical research commander: It would be ‘terrible’ if political pressure rushed Covid-19 vaccine A retired major general who helped develop vaccines and ran the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research warns that it “could be terrible” if political pressure rushed a Covid-19 vaccine.”I trust the FDA won’t roll over for politics, but there’s always a possibility. Trump is not a very good scientist, to say the least,” said Dr. Philip Russell, a retired major general and former commander of the US Army Medical Research and Development Command.President Donald Trump says the effort to create a vaccine, which his administration has dubbed “Operation Warp Speed,” is moving with “record, record, record speed.””My administration cut through every piece of red tape to achieve the fastest-ever, by far, launch of a vaccine trial for this new virus,” Trump said May 15, adding that the researchers involved have “never moved like this, or never even close.”Before it goes on the market, a vaccine must first be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, after undergoing a rigorous, three-phased trial process.”I would hope the FDA stands fast and demands enough safety data that we won’t kill somebody with it,” said Russell, a recipient of the Legion of Merit who helped develop vaccines against malaria, hepatitis A and adenovirus.Writing in The New York Times Monday, a University of Pennsylvania professor whose team developed a vaccine for rotavirus and a former White House health policy adviser under President Barack Obama, said they have concerns about political pressure to rush a Covid vaccine.
Hour 2 – Outside The Box With Ty Bollinger!
It’s time to go Outside The Box again with Ty Bollinger! What will we be talking about today?
Contact Tracing & The Dawn of Soviet America We still get chills every time we watch this! For us, these words are frozen in time, still instantly identifiable 40 years after a team of amateur Olympians representing the USA beat a seemingly unbeatable Soviet (“professional”) national hockey team as the Cold War again was intensifying.America’s “world-shaking” 4-3 victory over USSR was the greatest upset in the history of sports.If you were alive in 1980, you’ll remember that the Olympic Games were being played during the “cold war” era and extreme political tension between the USA and the USSR. During the cold war, we perceived the USSR as our biggest threat and constantly believed that World War III was right around the corner.We both remember hearing about the KGB and all the spying by “Big Brother” and feeling afraid and worrying about the future. At school, we learned about the extreme measures which the USSR and the KGB took to monitor, control, and (ultimately) enslave its people.The KGB is watching, watching, watching every minute.KGB stands for “Komitet Gosudarstvennoy Bezopasnosti” (which translates to “Committee for State Security” in English) and was the primary security agency for the Soviet Union from 1954 until its collapse in 1991.Its primary role within the USSR was to quell dissent, but first they had to identify the “dissidents.” This was done primarily by watching and listening to all the citizens. Phone calls were never private. Dissidents were identified … and silenced. To perform this task, KGB agents often used extremely violent means.
North Texas Grassroots React to Contact Tracing As Texas moves forward on a multimillion-dollar contract with a questionable company to track who Texans have been in contact with, grassroots leaders in the Dallas-Fort Worth metroplex have expressed concern about their right to privacy. They also have questions for Gov. Greg Abbott.The Center for Disease Control describes contact tracing as “a core disease control measure employed by local and state health department personnel for decades” and “a key strategy for preventing further spread of COVID-19.”Call-center workers known as contact tracers follow up with infected patients to see who they’ve been in contact with. Tracers would then reach out to these individuals and encourage them to get tested or to self-quarantine.To help with contact tracing, Apple and Google have made the Bluetooth technology in their smartphones available for governments to track who coronavirus-infected patients have been in contact with. While both companies argue they are working to maintain privacy, they still retain the ability to remotely force your smartphone to track who you’ve been in contact with and record these interactions in a log. These logs could then be handed over to government officials.
Facebook Relies on Gates-Funded W.H.O. to Define ‘Vaccine Misinformation’ On May 22, Facebook removed my IGTV interview with Polly Tommey ten minutes after I posted it, without comment or explanation. There were no inaccuracies in the 45-minute segment. Every statement can be sourced to peer-reviewed science.Mark Zuckerberg says that Facebook relies on the World Health Organization (WHO) to determine which stories are “vaccine misinformation”. That term is now a euphemism for any statement that departs from WHO’s official pronouncements which are often a cavalcade of inaccuracies and falsehoods.WHO is the instrumentality of Bill Gates. Gates is the single largest donor to WHO and the world’s largest vaccine producer. WHO’s 2019 pronouncement that “vaccine hesitancy” is one of the greatest global threats to public health, is, in itself, a whopping stretcher of vaccine misinformation. That statement is emblematic of how Gates’s dictatorial control has made WHO a sock puppet for his personal obsessions and his private financial agenda. Gates also funds Facebook ‘s Fact checker function (Politifact) giving him the power to censor and control the flow of global information.Where are all my friends, the liberal advocates for free speech? How long will they remain silent?
Even COVID-19 Can’t Kill the Anti-Vaccination Movement—Thoughts of a Vaccine Safety Advocate Last month, the BMJ published an article titled “Even covid-19 can’t kill the anti-vaccination movement” in which the author, Katrina Megget, provided the results of a study of 1,000 New Yorkers on April 24-26 regarding uptake of a coronavirus vaccine when one becomes available. These results found that 59% of the people surveyed said they would get the vaccine and 53% would allow their children to receive one. The article goes on to outline what the author believes to be “misinformation” about vaccination and characterizes the upcoming vaccine as humanity’s salvation. In a move we don’t see nearly often enough, the BMJ followed up the article with commentary, in its entirety, from long-time vaccine safety advocate Josh Mazer.Dear Editor,I read with interest “Even Covid -19 can’t kill the anti-vaccination movement“. President Trump’s “Operation Warp Speed,” the crash program to develop a covid-19 vaccine should give any sentient, thinking medical consumer reason for pause. Voices on the left and right, inside and outside of the medical community, are sounding cautionary notes about ignoring established safety protocols to speed development of a covid shot.Yet Trump is demanding, and getting, short cuts. MSN reported May 5: “Medical staff at the University of Maryland School of Medicine spent early Monday injecting the first few people with a potential vaccine for the coronavirus as part of an accelerated international effort.” “We’re not skipping any steps, but we are speeding them up quite a bit,” said Dr. Kirsten Lyke, and “she’s never done one quite…this quickly.”
Eight Fraudulent Cancer Research Studies Contained The Same Copied Results. How Does This Happen? Last week, a U.S.-based cancer researcher was reading scientific research papers related to their field of study . The scientist started reading a paper about genetic regulation in lung cancer, but quickly realized they had read a very similar paper just a few days before. Except that one was about gastric cancer and upon further investigation, not only were they similar, many of the tables and graphs were practically identical.The scientist contacted Dr Elisabeth Bik, a microbiologist with an unusual talent for uncovering image manipulation, duplication and fraud in scientific papers. Bik has been able to uncover over 2,000 cases of scientific fraud to-date and now does this on a voluntary basis, full-time, also working as a science consultant and running her blog Science Integrity Digest.“I looked at these papers and saw they had identical graphs, some protein blot photos and they looked very similar except that the disease, title and text, authors were different, different affiliations, hospitals and cities in China. It was very suspicious,” said Bik.Bik confirmed that the data in the two papers did indeed appear to be practically copies of each other, despite the papers claiming to focus on patients with completely different types of cancer. The chances of this happening randomly are next to none. She initially thought that one paper was just copying the other and perhaps one was genuine, but concluded this was unlikely as one hadn’t been published before the other was submitted for publication.
Remember Friends, The Power to Heal is Yours!
More upcoming RSB events:
- MAHO Expo Convention & Trade Show, Columbus OH – July 24-26, 2020