November 5, 2012

You can go into a market and pick out organic vegetables and fruit.  This isn’t something you do through magic or secret divination with a special wand.  There are labels that tell you the food is organic.

“Experts” claim organic food is no better or safer than food drenched with pesticides.  But still, you can choose organic.

You have a right to know.  And then, knowing, you have a right to make your choice.

You can go into a market, pick out a food product, and read a list of its ingredients as long as your arm. But you’ll find no mention of whether someone shot insect genes into it.

For some reason, you have no right to know about that.

It’s no accident.  The powers-that-be want it that way.

On Tuesday, the voters of California will cast the die on Prop 37.  Yes on 37 means GMO food will henceforth be labeled.

The idea behind 37 is simple.  If you’re eating food, you have a right to know what’s in it and what’s been done to it.  Government scientists and corporate scientists can claim GMO food is “the same in all aspects” as non-GMO, but you still have a right to know.

Monsanto and it allies claim that you knowing is unfair, because you might be swayed, by your own prejudice, to leave that GMO food on the market shelf, when in fact there is no reason to leave it there.

They are telling you the companies who are selling you food are more important than your own judgment about what to put in your body.

You would be impeding commerce if you believe GMO food is bad for you, and in order to protect GMO companies and the economy, you must go into a market blind, to keep things “honest.”

That’s what they think of you: you’re an idiot.  You can’t make reasonable judgments.  Therefore, you need to be blind.

Let me draw an exact parallel.  Let’s suppose you were part of a group that was rallying for a particular political cause, and the government had planted an FBI agent in your midst.

Now, if exposed and questioned, this FBI plant would say, “I wasn’t there to disrupt or influence the group in any way.  I was merely trying to protect good Americans.  I was there to observe, nothing more.”

Would you nevertheless have the right to know he was there?  Would you have the right to decide whether you wanted him there?  Or are you too stupid to know that he should be there because America is in danger and we need people like him to spy on us without our knowing, to keep us safe?

It’s the same situation.  They tell you the genes planted in your food are neutral in every sense.  They affect nothing.  They’re good genes and they do good work.  But because you might not think so, because you’re too stupid to know the truth, you have to be blind about what’s in your food when you choose it and buy it and eat it.

That’s the argument.

YES ON 37=you have a right to know.

NO ON 37=you need to be protected against your own stupidity.

According to this logic, the NO ON 37 people have a right, even a moral duty, to lie to you, to say whatever they need to, in order to move you in the direction of giving up your right to know.  They should lie, they have to lie, since their “truth” wasn’t doing the job.

And they have lied.

In other words, they’re looking at you as if you were a leading suspect in a criminal case.  The cops can put you in a room, they can falsely say they have a witness who saw you at the scene of the murder, who saw you dump the gun in a garbage can.  They can falsely say they have you on video committing the murder.  They can lie about all this non-existent evidence.

The Supreme Court has ruled this is legal in criminal cases.  The cops can do this to get a confession from a suspect.

In the same way, the NO ON 37 people can tell you anything, can lie to you about anything, because it’s assumed their cause is just.

Your inherent right to know is a threat to the established order.  It must be taken away.

The government is trying to make the same argument about vaccines.  They want to close down all possible exemptions that would allow you to refuse a vaccine for yourself or your child.  Why?  Because, they say, only a moron would refuse a vaccine.  Therefore, the CDC can make all sorts of false statements about dire disease threats and pandemics that aren’t pandemics, in order to scare you into taking a vaccine.  It doesn’t matter what they say, as long as it results in you getting the vaccine.

And since you’re too stupid to realize the country is under constant threat from terrorists and, therefore, the government has to spy on you 24/7, they spy on you without a warrant.  Secretly.  Otherwise, you might object.

All these examples of preempting your right to know the truth are connected.  They are the strategy of the corporate-government complex that runs America.

They claim to have a monopoly on truth.  To impose the truth, they need to lie.

The massive push to defeat Prop 37 in California tomorrow is the latest illustration.

Cops need to lie, the FBI needs to lie, the CDC needs to lie, Homeland Security needs to lie, so NO ON 37 needs to lie.

Does it make you feel warm and safe?

Jon Rappoport

The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California.  Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe.  Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.  You can sign up  for his free emails at